| Change in
PMP Score |
Number of
Companies |
Change in
Profit Growth
($ millions) |
Ave.
Change Per Company
($ millions) |
| Increase |
36 |
+10,584 |
+294 |
| No Change
|
8 |
+624 |
+78 |
| Decrease |
8 |
-128 |
-16 |
Table 2.
Changes in Company Profits as a Result of Changing People
Management Practices. Profit growth measured over 3
years.
| Change in
PMP Score |
Number of
Companies |
Change in
Total Return
(over 3 years) |
Value of
$1000 on Stock after 3 Years |
| Increase |
36 |
69% |
$1690 |
| No Change
|
8 |
45% |
$1450 |
| Decrease |
8 |
20% |
$1200 |
Table 3.
Changes in Total Return to Investors as a Result of
Changing People Management Practices.
the eight
companies with declining PMP scores, they had $16 million
less in profits than earlier, a decline of about 3% over
the three years.
This difference of over $200 million in profits per
company over three years is very significant. Many a CEO
has had a career made or broken over far smaller changes
in profit, though it must be remembered that these are
very large corporations.
The predictive data, like the correlational data,
is quite clear. Companies that manage the people-side of
the business more effectively increase their profits more
rapidly. And the same is true for the other financial
results such as the growth in sales and profit margins.
Table 3 shows changes in total return to investors
over the same three years for these 52 companies. Total
return here includes both gains in the value of the stock
plus dividends, assuming the dividends are reinvested.
Stockholders would clearly value by purchasing the stocks
of the companies that have the best people management
practices.
If someone invested in the stocks of companies that
improved their people management practices, they would
have gained 69% over three years (23% per year
compounded). This is more than three times what they
would have gained from investing in the stocks of
companies that decreased in people management practices.
Altogether, investors would have an additional $490 in
total return for each $1000 invested. CEOs whose bonuses
are based upon stock appreciation should take note. Not
only would their shares be worth more, but they would
likely see larger bonuses as well.
Survival
Many people commonly think that companies, once
they are large, will be around forever. Actually, there
are no guarantees. Forbes magazine pointed out in a
recent special issue that only two companies in the 100
group today were in that same group in the year 1900
(they were AT&T and U.S. Steel). As the table below
shows, things can change rapidly in just ten years.
| 1987 Group |
Percent in Existence |
| Top 20 List |
80% |
| Bottom 20 List |
30% |
Companies profiled here are those who made our Top
20 and Bottom 20 list in 1987. These lists were
calculated by simply ranking companies based upon their
overall PMP scores at the time. We then calculated how
many of these companies exist at all today as separate
entities. A total of 80% of the Top 20 group is still
around while only 30% of the Bottom 20 have survived.
A
total of 80% of the 20 group is still around while only
30% of the Bottom 20 survived
Many of these companies that no longer exist went
through mergers or were acquired by others "to
increase shareholder value." But many of those in
the Bottom 20 had severe financial difficulties and this
was the reason for their being acquired. None of those in
the Top 20 which no longer exist had severe financial
problems. This still shows the powerful and pervasive
link between people management and success. Even with
something as basic as survival.
|